Dogmatic Logo
The Canine in Conversation
contents page back to last page visited reload this page prior page in site next page in site
CONTENTS BACK RELOAD PRIOR NEXT
photograph of rocker Joe Cocker flexing his bicep
figure 1  

 

mad dog. Someone who is fighting mad, perhaps a crazed fighter who has no thought for his own health and well being.

Dogs engaged in attack can indeed exhibit this kind of no-holds-barred viciousness, so perhaps it is apt. George Orwell classes this term, along with others “peculiar to Marxist writing.” He included “lackey” and “petty bourgeois” in this category.reference 1 I guess that they hadn't started using “running dog” yet. That came later. Perhaps it was just that Orwell didn't much like Noel Coward, whose 1931 song, “Mad dogs and Englishmen” noted that Anglo cultures are anomalous for going out in the midday sun, while any sensible society takes a siesta in the shade.reference 2 Once again, the image is of someone who is thoughtless of personal safety and without sense.

I also came across this wonderful discussion of metaphor, using mad dog as the example:

We are arguing in this work that metaphors are statements which symbols refer to the entity called image-state. And the propositional form of a metaphor ('A is B') is a key element in their understanding. This form requires that A could be seen as B, or that dynamics of A is the same as dynamics of B. The only difference between metaphorical statement John is a mad dog and the statement John is a man is in the way we used to analyze them. In the case of a literal statement ('John is a man') we will search for absolute match between properties of two arguments of the statement. In the case of metaphorical statement ('John is a mad dog') John would be seen as a mad dog.reference 3

 

 

1. Orwell, George. 1946. Politics and the English Language. In In Front of Your Nose, 1945-1950, edited by I. S. O. Angus. Boston: David R Godine.

2. Knowles, Elizabeth. 1999. The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. 5th ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

3. Repeko, Alexander. 1999. Understanding Metaphorical Statements, Cognitive Science Department, New Bulgarian University.
line
About the illustration: Joe Cocker, the 60's mad dog of pop, also an Englishman. This image is excerpted from a record sleeve, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher or the creator of the work depicted. I believe that the use of scaled-down, low-resolution images of posters to provide critical commentary on the music in question or of the image itself qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image may be copyright infringement.
see also: mad-dogging; rabid dog; junkyard dog; attack dog politics; Mad Dog Mark Madsen
cf: bulldog; running dog (politics)
Last updated: January 13, 2009
by Alec MacLeod 2001-2008  Dogmatic Technologies Oakland Creative Commons unless otherwise expressly stated, all original material of whatever nature created by Alec MacLeod and included in The Canine in Conversation and any related pages, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Please read the Terms of Use Agreement by Alec MacLeod Dogmatic Technologies